%20(1).png)
I read and edit a lot of Jane Austen fan fiction (JAFF). It’s fascinating to me all the different stories and scenarios writers reimagine Austen’s masterpieces. Keeping Austen’s characters recognizable to the reader is vital to make the work credible, especially when the story strays far from canon. Sometimes, though, an author may write Darcy in a scene that seems so out of character from how Austen wrote him that I have to raise a big, red flag.
But how can writers make that work? By working on their interiority, their psyche. What is going on in the character’s head? We need to see why a character reacts in a situation. What makes them process the information as they do?
In essentials I believe Mr. Darcy is very much what he ever was. When I said that he improved on acquaintance, I did not mean that either his mind or manners were in a state of improvement. But that from knowing him better his disposition was better understood.—Jane Austen
If a JAFF writer has only relied on Austen’s interiority, some readers will say, “These people aren’t anyone I recognize; they've simply written a story and added Pride and Prejudice names.” We have to understand why the author made the characters behave differently than what Austen wrote. When fans read JAFF, they expect a certain amount of consistency with the primary characters at least.
If you are getting feedback on your work about "not connecting with your characters," take a closer look at interiority. Do you agree?
